Search for: "G. G. v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 11,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
The mother stated that in the first incident, the father “became angry, called her demeaning names, threw objects at her, and headbutted her while the child was at her feet” (BCCA at para 10). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Jeffrey J. Spina-Jennings
The benefits of filing a Form 1024-A would include public recognition of 501(c)(4) status and potential exemption from state taxes. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
 Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives)  in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]