Search for: "GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORP." Results 81 - 100 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2016, 8:58 am by Ad Law Defense
Genesis Healthcare Corp., 724 S.E.2d 250 (2011). [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:20 am by Andrew Trask
Instead, because the plaintiff had sought only statutory damages:  here as in Genesis Healthcare Corp., defendant’s offer of judgment offered plaintiff complete relief on his individual claims, and plaintiff ‘failed to assert any continuing economic interest in shifting attorney’s fees and costs to others. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:52 am by John G. Papianou
Regal Collections, 385 F.3d 337 (3d Cir. 2004), held that Rule 68 offers do not moot class claims, the Supreme Court in Genesis Healthcare Corp v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The Supreme Court majority rejected these arguments, affirming the Ninth Circuit below on an issue that divided the circuits, and which the High Court had left unanswered in its 2013 holding in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v Symczyk, an FLSA collective action. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:33 am by Joy Waltemath
The problem was that not all the cases cited by the plaintiffs have survived the Supreme Court’s ruling in Genesis Healthcare Corp v Symczyk. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
The Supreme Court majority rejected these arguments, affirming the Ninth Circuit below on an issue that divided the circuits, and which the High Court had left unanswered in its 2013 holding in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v Symczyk, an FLSA collective action. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:18 am by Andrew Trask
A divided Supreme Court roundly rejected that argument, and, in the process, reminded courts that (a) there is no due process right to a class action, and (b) class actions are supposed to be difficult to bring. (3) Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:40 am by Ronald Mann
The issue first reached the court in 2013, with Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]