Search for: "GOLDSTEIN v. VIRGINIA"
Results 81 - 100
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 4:06 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Moore v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
More coverage of Monday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am
Other coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:07 pm
Four Justices dissented in Burwell v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:13 pm
In Zubik v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:12 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
California Teachers Association 14-915Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief by the American Federation of Teachers and American Association of University Professors in support of the respondents in this case.Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:37 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in the challenge by former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell to his fraud convictions. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:19 am
” Yesterday the Court issued its decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik and is also among the counsel to the petitioners in Samsung. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Personhuballah, the challenge to a Virginia congressional district; and RJR Nabisco v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heffernan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am
In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
