Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In the first of the three lawsuits filed against Hifter, Elzagally et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
National Socialist Party of America v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, class action funding arrangements are required to be disclosed by Standing Order of all judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
JACK DRESNER, ET AL., Appellees. 3rd District. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In fact, in almost two of every three households in America with dependents, both parents work to make ends meet.[3] Combine this statistic with the reality that the tax code treats married couples who file jointly as a singular tax unit. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 5:56 pm
LLC employees from continuing a whistleblower action over allegedly false Plavix blood thinner marketing because one of them dropped out, in United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: : Chapter 11 : Murray Metallurgical Coal : Case No. 20-10390 Holdings, LLC, et al., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
There is a long history of pirate websites locating themselves outside of the United States but marketing themselves to U.S. users in a deceptive manner that makes it difficult for consumers, including both consumers and brands, to distinguish an illegitimate site from a legitimate one. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:01 am
Legal documents in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
City of Seattle, et al. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Targeted infrastructure funding is partly addressed by a Senate appropriations bill that devotes $690 million in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) broadband loan and grant programs (presumably including the ReConnect program). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:17 am
Facts: This case (Martinez et al v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm
The case is Jeremy Simons et ux, et al v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
