Search for: "GRAVES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit--has gone on to also address the other half of the RFRA equation:  the D.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 3:35 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Por otra parte, el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos determinó en junio de 2008 que la Segunda Enmienda de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos protege un derecho individual a tener y portar armas que está ligado a la auto-preservación del individuo en District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
That position has undeniable appeal; over the past six years, voters and legislators in eleven States and the District of Columbia have revised their laws to allow marriage between two people of the same sex. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This narrow interpretation of Section 109 was stretched to the breaking point by the Delaware Supreme Court’s en banc decision in  ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Initially passed in 1965, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act required “covered jurisdictions,” at first in the Deep South and later extended to Texas, Arizona, Alaska, and certain counties and townships in other states, to “pre-clear” any changes in their election laws with the Justice Department or the District Court of the District of Columbia before putting them into effect. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
In the first case, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ultimately ruled that the claims of the Native American petitioners were barred by laches. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am by Wells Bennett
There is much to pore over in last week’s release by the Director National Intelligence. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
The hospitals have appealed a March 30, 2013, ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Any one of these developments would be grave for any normal lawyer or legal enterprise. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Cacace involved the latest attempt to get the Court to explore whether its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm by Antonin I. Pribetic
Madam Justice Allen notes, [4]         On a standard of “clear and convincing evidence”, the Plaintiffs proved their claim to the satisfaction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
  The Court left that question unanswered in 2009, when it decided Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]