Search for: "GREEN v. VIRGINIA" Results 81 - 100 of 553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Virginia, it noted the possibility that such publicity can cause otherwise unknown witnesses to come forward.[3] Witnesses might likewise come forward in a civil case: "It is conceivable that witnesses, upon the disclosure of Doe's name, will 'step forward [at trial] with valuable information about the events or the credibility of witnesses.'"[4] And if only one side is pseudonymous, "information about only [the other] side may thus come to light. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
See Allie Humphreys, Note, Has Blue Overshadowed Green? [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm by Phil Dixon
On appeal, the defendant argued that Green had been abrogated by Evans v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Erie Ins. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Erie Ins. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda:     THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto     Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020)    July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:49 am by Unknown
H.R.2644 - To provide direct funding to local, Tribal, and territorial governments to establish Green New Deal programs and initiatives, and for other purposes. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, if the Supreme Court reforms qualified immunity anytime soon, the history books will say the Court first showed its hand this month in Tanzin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]