Search for: "GRIFFIN"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
She pummeled Mitchell over his reliance on Griffin’s Case, his departure from the constitutional text, and his distortions of history. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
On the same day, Richard Spearman KC dismissed the defamation claim in Griffin v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:55 am
Comedian Kathy Griffin has not only become persona non grata after her gory depiction of a beheaded Trump but she is now beseeching people to buy tickets for a languishing come-back tour. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Again, he hedged on whether Griffin's Case was correct: "the answer to all three of those questions turns on whether this Court agrees with the holding of Griffin's Case. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin’s Case and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts; Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin’s Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Griffin's Case and Original Meaning The strongest defender of Griffin's Case was Justice Kavanaugh. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Over the course of his arguments, Mitchell repeatedly referred to Griffin’s Case, a federal circuit case from 1869 that concerned the “insurrection clause. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election BallotPart Two: The Three Possible, but Less-than-Ideal, Dispositions of the CasePart Three: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t AddressBruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do [UPDATED to respond to Bruce's follow-up post]Part Four: Trump’s Argument That… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
The Court will likely reverse the Colorado Supreme Court based on Griffin's Case, the absence of congressional legislation enforcing Section 3, and the prudential and pragmatic arguments made in Section 3 of the Brief signed by Attorneys General Edwin Meese III, Michael B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
“Griffin’s Case is also relevant to trying to figure out what the original public meaning of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is,” he says. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Griffin, involved a defendant’s challenge to a criminal conviction based on the fact that the judge in the case had fought for the Confederacy. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:14 pm
He cited Griffin’s Case, an 1869 decision by Chief Justice Salmon Chase, serving on a lower court. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Griffin's Case has settled the meaning of Section 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
in the Couy Griffin case currently pending.) [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You will likely hear references to Griffin’s Case in the arguments. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post, I’ll discuss the first of the CRSCC’s off-ramp arguments, which invokes Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in In re Griffin, 11 F. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Trump relies on a very old circuit court case, In re Griffin (1869), in which Chief Justice Samuel Chase ruled that Section 3 was inoperative until Congress passed enabling legislation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
[Note: This is the fifth in a series of essays responding to objections that have been made to enforcing Section Three of the Constitution. [read post]
