Search for: "Garcia v. Morales" Results 81 - 100 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For example, recent Copyright Office report on moral rights, which you’ve just heard about. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am by Arkady Bukh
Von Braun’s crown jewel was his developing the Saturn V rocket that carried men to the moon. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia argues that “Kavanaugh’s 2014 dissenting opinion in SeaWorld of Florida, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply   Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply   Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
The gavel came down on three petitions out of the Fifth Circuit—Pachecho-Garcia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Moral rights: the author imbues work with personality. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Personality theory: does a nonhuman have any moral rights? [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Morales-Aldahondo , No. 06-2533 Conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed over claims that the district court: 1) should have suppressed incriminating evidence because it was obtained pursuant to a search warrant predicated on stale evidence; and 2) erred by allowing the government to display unfairly prejudicial explicit images to the jury. [read post]