Search for: "Gardner v State"
Results 81 - 100
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys.,… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys.,… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys.,… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys.,… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:20 pm
Ameron International Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm
Ameron International Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:18 pm
In 1972, the US Supreme Court determined in the collective cases known as Furman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:02 am
The Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc in Chism v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
Edward Still of Birmingham is counsel of record in the case; Cecil Gardner and Sam Heldman of the Gardner Firm in Mobile and DC, respectively, are also counsel in the case. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:25 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
Aug. 1, 2016) (Ord.), Gardner v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:43 pm
Gardner v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:17 am
The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction of first-degree murder in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:35 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:31 pm
" See, Gardner v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 8:35 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
