Search for: "Gardner v. State of California" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm by Mike Aylward
  California Supreme Court ruled in Minkler v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am by Mandelman
  I understand how it happened, however, as it’s an easy mistake to make, thanks to the California State Bar’s ongoing refusal to make clear what California’s “new” law prohibits and what it allows. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
Sharp Corporation, et. al (Docket Report) Stays pending patent reexamination: Sweetening the deal: TDY Industries v Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court E D California: False marking complaint alleging defendant had ‘no reasonable basis to believe’ its products were patented sufficiently pled intent to deceive: Hallstrom v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:33 am by Adam Schlossman
The Supreme Court itself added the second question when it granted the State of California’s certiorari petition, seeking to determine the effect of a California Supreme Court order simply stating that the “[p]etition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by Paralegal Mentor
In the Bits & Bytes Legal Analysis segment, Kroll Ontrack Legal Correspondent Kelly Kubacki explores City of Ontario, California v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 2:26 pm by Stephen Gardner
This issue was squarely addressed in    a recent case applying California law, Williams v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:51 am by Matt Bartus
UPS (California 2009). $12.8 million settlement for misclassification of delivery drivers Gardner v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:58 pm by Rick
The Court also notes that in United States v. [read post]