Search for: "Georgetown University v. D.C. DOES"
Results 81 - 89
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm
The Telegram TRO Dating back to as early as 2014, the SEC began bringing enforcement actions relating to cryptocurrency, and with its October 11, 2019 filing of SEC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Does the budget appropriately provide for contingencies in the event of a cyber-attack or cybersecurity need [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
John Reed Stark As I noted in a post at the time, on February 20, 2018, the SEC issued its guidance for cybersecurity-related disclosures. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
(Please see the item following the guest post and related footnotes, below, regarding the upcoming March 2016 Cybersecurity Docket Incident Response Forum to be held in Washington, D.C.) [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
John Reed Stark One of the most interesting and arresting business stories of 2017 has been the astonishing proliferation of initial coin offerings (ICOs), as I discussed in a prior post (here). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
