Search for: "Gertz v. Gertz" Results 81 - 100 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2015, 12:55 pm
To the extent that Defendant has freely entered the public square and “thrust himself into the vortex of th[ese] public issue[s],” Gertz v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
Butts, the “actual malice” requirement was extended to apply to “public figures” outside government, and then in 1974 case Gertz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 771 (1976) (false statements in advertising are unprotected); Gertz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 The actual damage requirement was discussed by the United States Supreme Court in Gertz v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:57 am by Lee E. Berlik
Why this isn’t the standard in other states is a mystery, because its origins lie in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Gertz v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:57 am by Lee E. Berlik
Why this isn’t the standard in other states is a mystery, because its origins lie in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Gertz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
"[5] [1] Restatement (Second) of Torts § 569. [2] Gertz. [3] Restatement (Second) of Torts § 576(c) (1977); see, e.g., Oparaugo v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court observed in the 1974 case of Gertz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
(I also think knowledge or recklessness as to falsehood would have to be shown for prosecutions for criminal libel even of private figures, so long as the allegations are on a matter of public concern, see Gertz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In the early years after New York Times, several justices (lead by Justice Brennan) pushed toward having the actual malice standard depend on speech being on matters of public concern, an effort that ended in Gertz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The classic formulation by Justice Powell in a 1974 case, Gertz v Robert Welch Inc, reflects this uncompromising position: Under the First Amendment there is no such thing as a false idea. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 6:32 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 13 (1990) (internal quotation marks omitted); Gertz v. [read post]