Search for: "Ginsburg v. Ginsburg"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
”Expert Statement Jared Holt (Resident Fellow, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Atlantic Council) Expert Statement Brian Hughes (Associate Director, Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University)Expert Statement Aziz Huq (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School) and Tom Ginsburg (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School)“Statement on the January 6, 2021 Attacks and the Threat to American Democracy”Expert… [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
Use “winks and nods,” as the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put it. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
Justice Ginsburg was replaced by Justice Barrett. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
” Id., at 133 (Souter, J., joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., dissenting). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
A wonderful result would have been full endorsement of the position endorsed by Justice Ginsburg in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
In Washington v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
”2Campbell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
Bastani v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm
Cougar Den (2019)—Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurrence, joined by Justice Ginsburg, supporting enforcement of Indian treaty. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:59 am
In 2003 in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am
Tam, Iancu v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
In Escobar v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who enjoyed an across-the-aisle friendship over many years together on the Court (even if it didn’t manifest itself in their votes or opinions). [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
But some state courts have held the practice is unconstitutional, and a host of prominent jurists, including Justices Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Clarence Thomas, have criticized the practice. [read post]
