Search for: "Givens v. Maine Department of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Given the Supreme Court’s pivotal importance in so many election disputes (from Reynolds v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am
Even if this was not correct, insufficient weight had been given to the appellant’s medical evidence. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
The new main claim incorporated an amended feature which, according to appellant’s own statement, “could be omitted if regarded as violating Art. 123(2)”. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
The new main claim incorporated an amended feature which, according to appellant’s own statement, “could be omitted if regarded as violating Art. 123(2)”. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
In the 1980 case of Maine v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Lord Neuberger’s main judgment deals with some of these issues before turning to the main points, and we shall do likewise. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Rita v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
But setting that aside, I think the main legal conclusion, which is that the government may exclude false and verifiable statements from its own “nonpublic forum” property, is likely correct. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Following a standard format used by the Department of Justice, the Application is divided into three main parts. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Of Corrections, 507 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Holder and Rucho v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
While it can be said that, in none of the cases discussed in paras 21-25 above was that point the main focus of attention, it nonetheless seems clear that that is what a succession of respected judges, many of whom had substantial experience in this area, considered to be the law. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
In a sense, all the other important and surprising portions of the appeal judgment on liability are merely obiter (i.e. unnecessary, and therefore not binding), if the court of appeal was correct on damages. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
