Search for: "Good v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 81 - 100
of 523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 1:00 am
In particular, the Court will decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against an unsuccessful regulator (except for good reason). [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am
This would not do any good to a jurisdictional s [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:49 am
It’s an issue that just won’t go away (see also the important discussion in Information Commissioner v (1) Poplar HARCA (2) People’s Information Centre [2020] UKUT 182 (AAC)). [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:01 pm
They invoke AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 11:47 pm
The effect of the only leading case in that area – Harries v Church Commissioners for England [1992] 1 WLR 1241, aka the Bishop of Oxford case, which concerned the Church of England’s investment policy in relation to South Africa – was unclear [1]: there is a helpful note on Harries here. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm
Failure to Take Corrective Measures – The Sturgis site has repeatedly failed to undertake reasonable measures to reduce natural or unavoidable defects to the level feasible as mandated by the current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:40 am
People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 12:58 pm
The lawsuit, Adam X. et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 4:31 am
The Full Court’s judgments are Commissioner of Patents v Ono Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
The central part of the 117-page opinion, captioned Texas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful? [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
In particular, the defendants claimed that (1) the California judgment was unenforceable for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) the agreement was unenforceable under the HSSA because the plaintiff failed to advise the defendants of their cancellation rights, and (3) the plaintiff failed to mitigate its damages and breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
And the Department of Justice filed court briefing opposing religious exemptions under Title VII for a teacher who resigned after refusing to use transgender students’ correct names and pronouns. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Everyone would like to have a judge in their advertisement to serve the greater good, but we do not all agree on what the greater good is. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 9:34 am
In making the announcement, Canada’s Commissioner of Competition said: “Portraying products or services as having more environmental benefits than they truly have is an illegal practice in Canada. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Soon after World War I, a committee of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws started work on a model statute. [read post]
