Search for: "Government's Motion" Results 81 - 100 of 30,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm by Brian Shiffrin
However, CPL 290.10, which governs TOD motions, gives courts the authority to grant TODs only when the evidence is not only legally insufficient as to the charged offense but also insufficient to support a conviction for a lesser. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
Petitioners' Memorandum of Law In Support of Their Motion (full text ) says: In discussions with petitioners' counsel ... the government confirmed that it did not believe either ISNA or NAIT had engaged in wrongdoing.... [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 7:32 am by Paula Lombardi
The Ontario government brought a motion to dismiss the case brought by Ecojustice on the basis there was no point proceeding because the regulation to revoke cap and trade is no longer in force. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:20 pm
  The order stated that in all other respects, Grace's motion to compel production of government attorney notes was denied. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:15 am
The Defense has replied to the Government's motion for a rehearing en banc. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:24 am by Sean Hanover
The rule that governs motions in limine is Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 402 and 403, which gives the Court jurisdiction to include (402) and exclude (403) any evidence. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:56 am by Jeff Vail
  The law governing requests for in camera examinations is not well settled, but here is a general guide:-Checklist:- Confer. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:34 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, No. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm by Jamie Reese
Specifically the lawsuit challenges the legality of the prohibition imposed on the federal government of not recognizing same-sex marriage [JURIST backgrounder]. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 5:58 am by Robert Ambrogi
A lawsuit claiming that the federal courts’ PACER system routinely overcharges for document downloads has survived the government’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:37 am by Kimberly Bennett
[JURIST] Lawyers for Guantanamo Bay detainees on Thursday filed [motion, PDF] an emergency application in the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] for a temporary restraining order prohibiting the government from depriving the inmates of the right to pray communally during the month of Ramadan. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
., the New York Times' motion, filed yesterday—and the government has just filed a motion agreeing, at least as to the warrant and some of its attachments (I'm not sure whether there are others that aren't included within the government's position): Although the government initially asked, and this Court agreed, to file the warrant and Attachments A and B under seal, releasing those documents at this time would not "impair… [read post]
 In the motion, the lawyers claim that the German government has committed the crime of aiding and abetting in the genocide of the Palestinian people living in Gaza by continuing to supply Israel with arms. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:18 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  While the military judge found error in the late discovery of the evidence, she denied repeated mistrial motions made by Bozicevich's civilian defense counsel, Charlie Gittins, choosing to limit the government's ability to counter defense evidence related to the late disclosures. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 8:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 25 Duluth Motion for Summary J 26 US Cross Motion for Summary J 27-1 Fond du Lac Proposed Amicus Bref 30 Duluth Reply 33 US Reply The materials on the federal government’s motion to dismiss are here. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:30 am by Coleman Saunders
The government opposed the motion and Rubin provided the defense the opportunity to present oral arguments for abatement. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am by Michael Lowe
  This means that the prosecution cannot use it against the accused in the government’s case. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:55 pm
The plaintiff landowner earlier filed a motion for partial summary judgment (1.5mb pdf) asking the court to declare the ordinance unconstitutional on its face under the Nollan/Dolan doctrine of unconstitutional exactions, which requires the government to show a substantial nexus between the exaction and some problem caused by the property owner before the government may demand tribute as a condition of development. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:07 pm by Wells Bennett
The motions hearing that begins tomorrow in the 9/11 military commissions case is far too sprawling to preview motion by motion. [read post]