Search for: "Grant v. Livingston"
Results 81 - 100
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:53 pm
Livingston Christian Schools v Genoa Charter Township, 2:15-cv-12793-GCS-DRG (8/23/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA, Uncategorized [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH E. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:54 am
.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Testamentary capacity to sign Will detailedIN THE MATTER OFTHE ESTATE OF HELEN M. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:02 pm
The other was Vega v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
Livingston Christian Schools v Genoa Charter Township, 2016 WL 3549337 (ED MI 6/30/2016) Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:39 am
The Court of Appeals (Carney, Livingston and Pooler) says "an informational disclosure law . . . [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
Jonathan Livingston Seagull,11Bach v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
Livingston County Circuit Judge Suzanne L. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Blake v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals brings the habeas petition back, granting Martinez a rare exception to the blown-deadline rule.The case is Martinez v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:34 pm
The Court of Appeals rejects the habeas petition, and that's probably the end of the line for this guy.The case is Chrysler v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm
The request for a thirty-day extension to file was granted on Thursday by Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:39 am
Today's sole published opinion, ACLU Fund of Michigan v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 8:51 am
More broadly, the First Amendment requires that the regulations limit any discretionary decisionmaking by state officials in granting or denying specialty plate ideas. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:46 am
What fascinates me is how the plaintiff's credibility was ripped apart at trial but he still won the case.The case is Wiercinski v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:28 pm
So it seems to me that Judge Livingston’s dissent expresses the better view here; I hope the Second Circuit agrees to hear the case en banc, or, if there is no en banc rehearing, that the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case (assuming the Walker v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:27 am
Where an Art 8 defence is raised by an occupier, it can be taken for granted that the public authority is seeking possession for two legitimate aims: vindicating their ownership rights and managing their housing stock. [read post]
