Search for: "Grant v. Maxwell"
Results 81 - 100
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 5:19 am
As The Court stated; "Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendants were under no obligation to plead, as an affirmative defense, the plaintiff's failure to comply with the statutory notice of claim requirement (see Laroc v City of New York, 46 AD3d 760, 761; Maxwell v City of New York, 29 AD3d 540, 541; Lynch v New York City Tr. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
Maxwell (C.A.6, 1967), 387 F.2d 134, certiorari denied (1968), 393 U.S. 1007, 89 S. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
In Velasquez v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
Employees’ Retirement Plan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
Judge Irving dissented joined by Judges Griffis and Maxwell. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
Maxwell Hoffman was sentenced to death after being convicted of taking part in the murder of Denise Williams, a police informant in a drug deal, in 1987... [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
And in Green v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm
Bowman, Maxwell S. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Churchill was one of its ‘founding fathers’ and the original text was drafted by British MP and lawyer/Nuremberg prosecutor Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
RUTAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:00 am
Ward (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Failure to Change Child Custody Reversed in Livingston Post-Divorce Matter: Maxwell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 10:28 am
Hilton v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
We granted review because this is an issue of first impression to this Court. . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
Andrea Bottorff of JURIST covers the Court’s grant in Salazar v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (apparently relisted eight times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Further, the case of Sheppard v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Further, the case of Sheppard v. [read post]
