Search for: "Gray v. Georgia"
Results 81 - 100
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am
Escondido, both the decision itself (blue Georgia) and its syllabus (black Georgia), to understand why: Nobody has asked the Supreme Court the right question. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Levy-Gray, 894 A.2d 563, 577 (Md. 2006); Nolan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
Mott—An Old Gray Mare—Reexamined Through Its Own History, 82 La. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Schwartz, of Gray Robinson. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Georgia appellate courts have also barred claims against pharmacists. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IPBiz) US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States, Pam Karlan in Lozman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm
Existing state laws authorized some of these actions; others occupied legal gray areas, as neither explicitly authorized nor explicitly prohibited. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 6:47 am
Clayton County, Georgia (140 S. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Or so said the Texas Court of Appeals (Amarillo) in Boes v. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 3:17 am
Supreme Court decision on substitute analysts, Smith v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:59 am
And then the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:00 pm
Clayton County, Georgia. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
