Search for: "Gray v. Group Home"
Results 81 - 100
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
In practice, however, there are still plenty of gray areas, resulting in long and expensive legal battles. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Drimal, Schottenfeld Group, LLC, Gautham Shankar, David Plate, Emanuel Goffer, and Michael Kimelman, Civil Action No. 09-09208 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.): In this case, the SEC alleged that a ring of Wall Street traders and hedge funds made over $20 million trading ahead of corporate acquisition announcements using inside information tipped by an attorney at the law firm Ropes & Gray, in exchange for kickbacks. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 3:15 am
Register of Copyrights Sounds Alarm Over Legal Group's 'Pseudo-Version of the Copyright Act' https://t.co/024ziYW23Q 2018-01-18 Electronic Wills Down Under and Closer to Home https://t.co/grxScNs14K 2018-01-18 Technology Law Highlights: 2017 Year in Review https://t.co/J80Y9drt9s 2018-01-18 Search Engines Aren’t Liable for Indexing ‘Scam’ Locksmith Listings–Baldino’s Lock v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Kiriakos v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Abadía Retuerta, SA v OHIM (IPKat) General Court - Design for ‘instruments for writing’: Beifa wins on appeal: Beifa Group Co. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
Millennium Radio Group LLC, No. 08-1743, Op. at 13 (D.N.J. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Gray, and a private individual, Charles J. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
Over at Lychner, the 58 men who shared the dormitory with the man who tested positive remain together, quarantined as a group. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Gilliam(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court E D Wisconsin: Another cautionary tale of joint website ownership: Third Education Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
Estimates of the number of potential claims against News Group varied from 20 to “up to 50”. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm
IPSO Rulings IPSO has published a series of rulings and a Resolution Statement from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 01612-18 Wadsworth v The Jewish Chronicle– Resolved via IPSO Mediation Resolution Statement – 01088-18 Staples v Yorkshire Post – Resolved via IPSO Mediation Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 9 May 2018 there was a statement in open… [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:31 am
Muller's actions are protected speech, this Court looks to the thoughtful analysis of Judge Edelman in the recent case Gray v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
” [ii]This quote is prominently displayed on the home page of the CAASE Illinois website. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
In the Courts On Monday 14 May 2012 Sir Charles Gray heard the pre-trial review in the second trial in the case of WXY v Gewanter. [read post]
