Search for: "Gray v. Miller" Results 81 - 100 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2022, 1:41 am by rainey Reitman
She was previously an attorney focusing on blockchain and emerging technologies at Ropes & Gray in San Francisco. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 14 May 2012 Sir Charles Gray heard the pre-trial review in the second trial in the case of WXY v Gewanter. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:41 am by rainey Reitman
She was previously an attorney focusing on blockchain and emerging technologies at Ropes & Gray in San Francisco. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Together with Opinions in the Cases Decided at January Term, 1837, Arising on the Restraints on the Powers of the States (1837) Samuel Freeman Miller, Lectures on the Constitution of the United States (1891) William H. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 6:23 am
Young, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Thursday, March 22, 2018 Tags: Business judgment rule, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Recapitalization [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Brian Miller suggests that “Kavanaugh’s record of clear and disciplined writing may be one of the most influential traits he brings to the Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
  Where the publication relates to a situation occurring in another country or where the sources for the defendant’s story are in a different country, it was accepted by Gray J in Al Misnad v Azzaman Ltd ([2003] EWHC 1783 (QB)) that the test of responsible journalism may have to be adapted to take account of these factors. [read post]