Search for: "Griffiths v. Griffiths"
Results 81 - 100
of 833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The barrister who acted for Andrew Griffith, the disgraced former MP who was found guilty of raping his wife and unsuccessfully attempted to retain anonymity throughout the family court proceedings (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882), has been forced to apologise for potentially breaching court rules and section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960, which forbids publication of details of any case involving children heard in private, when he disclosed… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 6:21 am
The post MICHAEL JOHN GRIFFITH v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
Guam v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Hensler, New York Times v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
In practice, s97 is most often relaxed where a child is missing or abducted and there is a need for a public appeal featuring the child’s name and picture, but there are occasional examples of the relaxation of s97 in other circumstances, including where there is no direct positive benefit to the child (see Al M (Children) [2020] EWCA Civ 283, and Griffiths v Tickle). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
Judgement on meaning was handed down by Mr Justice Griffiths in Smith v Baker [2022] EWHC 246 (QB) on 10 February 2022. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The stories were publishable because of a year-long battle to reveal the finding by freelance journalist Louise Tickle and Press Association’s Brian Farmer (backed by Tortoise Media) (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm
In a case highly dependent on its very unusual facts, the Court of Appeal in Griffiths v Tickle ([2021] EWCA Civ 1882) confirmed (in dismissing an appeal) that a mother and father involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings can be identified. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
” Griffith v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:57 am
Among the many provision in the Act is language to overrule the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:43 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
For, as Griffiths LJ said, in Lion Laboratories v Evans [1985] QB 526, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the iniquity is such as to make it vital the confidential information is published directly to the public. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am
I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings: In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Dave and I dissect the guilty plea of former Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith, accused of violating U.S. sanctions by giving a bland speech on cryptocurrency in North Korea. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
