Search for: "Gupta v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the  dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be view here  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, Plaintiff,… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the  dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be viewed here  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552,… [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:28 am by Vanita Gupta
Vanita Gupta is the president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
” The court further bolsters its analysis with Supreme Court of Virginia case law (Parish v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm by Joe Rosenbaum
By Douglas Schneller, Partner, Rimon Law Bankruptcy plans and contracts approved by bankruptcy courts routinely include “retention of jurisdiction” provisions, but a case decided last month, Gupta v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:17 am by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court ruled today in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
” President Andrew Jackson famously responded to the Supreme Court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. [read post]