Search for: "Guy v. Benefits Review Board"
Results 81 - 100
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
’l, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
And Walton’s findings will be reviewed deferentially, under the “clear error” standard. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:48 am
National Labor Relations Board to the Rescue! [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
Did your entry about That Guy really happen? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court upheld a lower court decision that the Board members were biased by personal self interest because half the optometrists in the state were employed by corporations, so that “success in the Board’s efforts would possibly redound to the personal benefit of members of the Board” (who were, as said, in private practice for their own account, and would benefit from elimination of competition from optometrists employed by… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
With respect to Beebe’s point about how well the system works for an unfamiliar judge: University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
., v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Christopher Hagenbush, FDLI Board: GMA’s new program for front of package information has received mixed reviews: mix of general nutrition information and promotional material. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
In Rooth v Board of Review, Docket No. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:14 pm
It's just a guy on a street corner, spouting gibberish, hoping someone will toss him a quarter. [read post]
9 May 2009, 11:00 pm
Merit Board director Ronald Cooley isn't a cop and doesn't chase bad guys. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:31 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Id. at *3.However the docs got their hands on this unapproved stent, it was supposed to be used in accordance with procedures overseen by the defendant's hospital's institutional review board ("IRB"). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
For the following reasons, we deny the petition for review and enforce the Board's order. 08a0051p.06 USA v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
A review of all published empirical articles written in English after 1989 found that the average child sexual abuse rates in the general public were about 17% for women and 8% for men (Putnam, 2003). [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
For the reasons that follow, we DENY Lazar'spetition for review. 07a0412p.06 USA v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 2:54 am
Questions from the broader free speech perspective: Should universities have institutional review boards for human subject research, and how aggressive should they be? [read post]
