Search for: "HARMON v. GAINES"
Results 81 - 100
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Nancy Kim, The License v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
There might be gains from rethinking subject matter of TM law and non-subject matter. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am
The bill also calls upon the Treasury Department to issue guidance on whether a gain or loss should be recognized in virtual currency transactions. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
The result is a system of great complexity, hazardous in terms of its harmonization objective and whose viability (due to a risk of incompatibility with the European treaties) is not guaranteed. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Doesn’t see why market has to mean economic value, but rather some other kind of gain. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a comprehensive and complex agreement. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:51 am
The GDPR would replace the current patchwork of national data protection laws with a single, harmonized, directly enforceable Regulation. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
House Passes Historic Financial Overhaul Legislation The House of Representatives passed historic legislation today overhauling the US financial regulatory system. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
For the most part, the Chapter 11 process has been able to harmonize the objectives of all financial stakeholders, and achieve equitable, pro-economic results. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
At the heart of the rule-resistant narrative is Graham v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Checks and balances: the separation of powers is ensured and a lack of ‘checks’ confirmed It seems as if the EDPS foresaw difficulties in gaining legal standing before the General Court due to the strict standing requirements of proving direct and individual concern under Article 263(4) TFEU. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you, Chair Gensler. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
To achieve that goal, vested interests want to harmonize international standards. [read post]
