Search for: "HARTFORD FIRE V US" Results 81 - 100 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
  In his fine dissenting opinion in the 1993 Hartford Fire antitrust case, Justice Scalia notes that “if the presumption against extraterritoriality has been overcome …, a second canon of statutory construction becomes relevant: ‘[A]n act of congress ought never to be construed to violate the law of nations if any other possible construction remains. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  As in Alabama, the legislature used a standard somewhat different from the Restatement formulations, but the idea is the same.California:  See Schroeder v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Hartford’s plan provided that its three-year limitations period ran from the time that proof of loss was due under the plan. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford., who stated: "The insured agrees, at reasonable times and places, as often as required, to submit to examination by agent of insurer, and to submit all relevant books of account, bills, invoices, vouchers, etc. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
         In the case of United States of American v. [read post]