Search for: "HH Party Store"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
HHS, a panel of the D.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al, that for-profit closely held corporations must be permitted to opt out of the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate on religious grounds. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 6:27 am
Under the regulations, eligible organizations could notify HHS in writing of their religious objections to providing such coverage (instead of filling out the DOL form to provide to their insurer or third-party administrator). [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
Separately, on August 25, 2014, SEMC submitted notification to HHS OCR regarding a breach of unsecured ePHI stored on a former SEMC workforce member’s personal laptop and USB flash drive, affecting 595 individuals. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
” The acts that violate their faith are the acts of the government, insurers, and third-party administrators, but RFRA does not entitle them to block third parties from engaging in conduct with which they disagree. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm
The October 17 FAQs include : A FAQ located here on ways in which contractors may store self-identification information in compliance with the revised Section 503 regulations, and provides several options; and A FAQ located here about how contractors may list jobs that are remote, full-time telework positions in compliance with VEVRAA’s mandatory job listing requirement. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:22 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.) addressing certain religious objections to such coverage. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 2014 BL 180313, U.S., No. 13-354, 6/30/14.) [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm
” If the eligible organization is self-funded, its third party administrator (TPA) must pay for contraceptive services (without imposing fees or cost-sharing requirements) or arrange for an insurer or other entity to pay for these services. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
Hobby Lobby Stores supplied much-needed clarity on contested questions regarding the scope and substance of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as applied to for-profit businesses. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
Quality Stores United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Interests of third parties. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:20 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., (S.Ct., June 30, 2014), the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Both points involve otherdecisions by the employer, independent of the decision whether to invoke the HHS accommodation. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 10:01 pm
Here’s a refresher of what’s planned for the Food Safety Modernization Act: Rule RIN / Link Next Action Date Final Rule Deadline Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls 0910-AG36 Re-proposed Language August 2014 Aug. 30, 2015 Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals 0910-AG10 Re-proposed Language August 2014 Aug. 30, 2015 Produce Safety Regulation 0910-AG35 Re-proposed Language August 2014 October 31, 2015… [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:15 pm
In that document, LabMD admits to having been contacted in May of 2008 by a third party, Tiversa, claiming that it had obtained an “insurance aging report” containing information about approximately 9,300 patients. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
The upshot of the points, taken together, is that Hobby Lobby's own brief calls into serious question whether the plaintiffs have alleged facts sufficient to establish that the HHS rule imposes a substantial burden on their exercise of religion.As for the first question: Hobby Lobby's brief, like Conestoga Wood's, confirms that these cases are not really about the question of corporate religious exercise that has dominated the briefing and public reporting.Hobby Lobby makes… [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
HIPAA-regulated entities are now on notice that the FTC’s standard on this issue may exceed that imposed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in enforcing HIPAA. [read post]
