Search for: "HOLDER v. BANKS" Results 81 - 100 of 1,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Philipp v Barclays Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 318, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the Quincecare duty does extend to cover account holders who are individuals as well as corporates. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am by Florian Mueller
Alarmed by those overtures, the German federal government became minority shareholder, and the European Commission--together with the European Investment Bank--entered into a financing agreement with CureVac. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the  rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:27 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  Bifurcation is unavailable because of Dewsnup, and stripping a wholly unsecured lien is unavailable in Chapter 7 because of Bank of America, NA v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:04 am by Russell Knight
Puterbaugh, 764 NE 2d 582 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 2002 “The statute creates a privilege which may be waived by the holder of the privilege” People v. [read post]
So called “Large Data Holders” with annual gross revenues in excess of $250 million or that collect covered data of more than 5 million individuals or devices or the sensitive data of more than 100,000 individuals or devices, would be required to conduct an annual impact assessment, including how it may mitigate potential harms to an individual. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Tax Foundation respectfully submits comment on the state tax and revenue implications of the proposed tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am by Philip Zelikow
Russian central bank assets are usually held in marketable securities, cash or gold. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am by CMS
On 19 January 2022, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Stanford International Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) v HSBC Bank Plc. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:00 am by NRF Digital Team
 The court emphasised the general principle that a company concerns itself only with registered holders of its shares. [read post]
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]