Search for: "Hale v. Harm"
Results 81 - 100
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 8:09 am
The decision-makers involved rejected the possibility that they faced a real risk of serious irreversible harm if removed from the UK while the outcome of any appeal was pending. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:09 am
Accordingly, the risk of serious irreversible harm is not the overarching test. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Barrett v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
Introduction On Wednesday 1 Mar and Thursday 2 Mar 2017, the Supreme Court hears the appeal of Nuclear Decommissioning Authority v Energy Solutions EU Ltd. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 5:31 am
See Hale v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:15 am
See Summit Bank v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Notably, in so holding, the opinion distinguished Hale v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:55 pm
Ward v LB Haringey. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Plaintiffs claim that during one visit, Kenneth "backhanded [her] hard enough to give [her] a black eye" and on another occasion Kenneth "threatened to physically harm Marc. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
Case citation: Rilley v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The public’s right to know has to be balanced against the potential harm, not only to this patient, but to all the others whose treatment could be affected by the risk of exposure. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:34 pm
In the meantime, thanks to the July/August Legal Action Housing: Recent Developments for the note on this s.204 county court appeal Mohammed v Southwark LBC. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
She was detained at Yarl’s Wood for almost three years (2008-2011) purportedly justified by the risks of absconding and harm despite a 2009 recommendation, under the Mental Health Act 1983, s 48 for her transfer to hospital. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
The offences included theft, assaulting a police officer, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, criminal damage, robbery, receiving stolen goods, possession of class A drugs, burglary and fraud offences. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
Although it is a rare judgment from Lady Hale that does not reference it, it is not directly applicable in UK law. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
Lucido v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
Lucido v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
A few weeks ago, the Georgia Court of Appeals handed down an interesting decision in Baskin v. [read post]
