Search for: "Hall v. People of State of California" Results 81 - 100 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
This post analyzes the issue the California Court of Appeals didn’t address in People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
But now you know which school is Suburban State University, and that my home state is California--not just Sunny Desert State. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
California (1971) (upholding the right to display vulgarities) and Cantwell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
CalECPA was introduced by California State Senators Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and Joel Anderson (R-Alpine), who both fought for years to get stronger digital privacy protections for Californians. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:20 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
It was a place for some of the first organized political activity by Black people in California, focusing on civil rights and voting rights, and even hosted major events like the California Colored Citizens’ State Convention. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
So there’s a need to state the obvious although it probably won’t get to the ears or minds of the people who ought to change their behavior. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
In both swing states and safe seats, Republicans say liberals hate them personally and may turn rioters or a police state on people who disobey them. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
The Court granted cert. in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]