Search for: "Hand v. Butts"
Results 81 - 100
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:01 am
Here's Derouen v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 5:53 am
This week, the South Carolina Supreme Court handed down a major ruling in Cruce v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:44 pm
Maryland v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:42 am
Cases T‑604/11 and T‑292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM is a decision of the EU General Court concerning two sets of opposition proceedings brought by Diset SA against two Community trade mark applications of Mega Brands (creator of Mega Bloks, the long-time Lego rival) based on a Spanish national registration. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 6:35 am
In discussing United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:32 am
Three weeks ago in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
” On 8 to 10 November 2021, Saini J heard the trial in the harassment and libel case of Davies v Carter, judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 15 November 2021. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:41 pm
A new decision by the Washington State Court of Appeals brings this question to the fore, State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:26 pm
As Kilburn raised his hands, Deputy Beach saw the butt of a handgun sticking out of Kilburn’s waistband. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
This brings us to the so-called “faithless,” or “anomalous,” electors in the two cases at hand: Chiafalo v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:48 am
Officer Lucas used Officer Dunker's laptop computer to issue the Citation and print it and hand it to [Appellant]. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
In its 2011 decision in Harrington v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:22 pm
On the other hand, if "transmit" is read to cover electronic transmissions generally, then the statute would apparently forbid even public posting of, say, a photograph depicting a female nipple or a naked butt (whether "pornographic," "artistic," or whatever else) on one's own page. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
On 13 and 14 November 2018 Supreme Court heard the appeal in the crucial “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited. [read post]
