Search for: "Harms v. Bennett" Results 81 - 100 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
Inforrm had an article criticising the “new” criminal offences added to the Online Safety Bill, which prohibit the sending of harmful communication, genuinely threatening messages and false information. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The Michael Geist blog had an article on the government’s response to the near-universal criticism of its Online Harms consultation. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The measures are described as a “welcome recognition of the prevalence and harms of image-based sexual abuse,” with the “potential to make a significant difference to the lives of victims. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am by Allan Blutstein
” In the context of biological opinions, it is reasonable to think of “finality” as you would under Bennett v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Hacked Off’s criticises the exception for newspaper comment sections – “the areas where harms thrive” – as it allows the “unregulated, irresponsible publisher to commit harms online with impunity”. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
LSE’s Professor Robin Mansell argues for more attention to the implementation of policies as governments take steps towards regulating digital platforms, and the need to expose the myths that hamper reflections on digital technologies and any harms they generate for the LSE Media Blog. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The Tech Giant is also seeking a permanent injunction banning NSO Group from using its software, services or devices “to prevent further abuse and harm to its users. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The libel and slander claim did not satisfy the serious harm requirement under s.1(1) Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The appearance comes after she told a US Senate committee hearing earlier this month that Facebook was “divisive” and harmful to children’s mental health. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Defining harm as individual harm, for example, fails to capture the many harms that online providers cause which are exercised at a societal level. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Applying the so-called “Dingle rule”, evidence of other publications harmful to the C’s reputation could not be relied on in respect of mitigation of damage or serious harm. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Stossel claims $2 million for the reputational harm and reduced viewership that he alleges occurred as a result of Facebook’s labels. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
A review of the record did not reveal that the child would suffer irreparable loss of status or other physical or emotional harm if a genetic marker test were ordered. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:51 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] 2 AC 273 held that the publication of the name of a police officer suspected of corruption was permissible in order to make vivid a story about police corruption, even though the named officer was ultimately cleared of any wrongdoing. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm by Lydia Estep
This rule is further explained in the Court’s decision in Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:06 am by SHG
But then there are cases like Williams-Yulee v. [read post]