Search for: "Harper v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2023, 2:31 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Harper – I correctly predicted the author (Chief Justice Roberts), but not the outcome, as I thought the Court would avoid the merits. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:53 am by Michael C. Dorf
Harper despite a very plausible argument that the case was moot. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 pm by Rick Hasen
Litigants will no doubt soon be arguing that state courts (and potentially other state actors… Continue reading The post Rob Yablon: “Moore v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm by Rick Hasen
Harper and state courts” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am by jonathanturley
Harper, in which North Carolina legislators argued that state courts could not override state legislatures on federal election districts. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:51 pm by Rick Hasen
Expect many more… Continue reading The post Expect Many More Lawsuits in Federal Court Against the Actions of State and Local Election Officials after Moore v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm by Ilya Somin
" The issue for the Supreme Court in Harper v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:17 am by Rick Hasen
It begins: It is indeed a cause for celebration that the United States Supreme Court, on a 6-3 vote in Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
Harper, but he, more than anyone, is the biggest loser in the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:25 am by William A. Jacobson
The post Supreme Court Rejects “Independent State Legislature” Theory In Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Rick Hasen
Harper, Rejecting Maximalist Version of Independent State Legislature Theory But Giving Federal Courts a Chance to Second Guess Some State Rulings as “Transgressing the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Harper – Chief Justice Roberts writes (perhaps as "per curiam") concluding that the case is moot and that grant of certiorari divested state courts of jurisdiction. [read post]