Search for: "Harris Express v. Jones"
Results 81 - 100
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
” In direct and express response to the Court’s holdings in Chicone and Scott, in May 2002, the Florida legislature enacted amendments to Florida’s Drug Abuse Prevention and Control law: (1) The Legislature finds that the cases of Scott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:10 pm
--Harris v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Last Wednesday, legal twittering was dominated by Leveson, the phone hacking settlements (see below), the Harry Redknapp verdict and the “Twitter joke trial“. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Harris. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Harris that the Federal Meat Inspection Act preempts a California state law, and expresses concern that current regulations are inadequate . [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Furthermore, even assuming that the majority has appropriately declined to apply Georgia’s generic express or implied trust statutes, the same requirement of the settlor’s intent nevertheless is found in the neutral principles approach, as articulated in Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
Harris and Kurns v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
Harris, wading once again into the mire of federal preemption. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:19 am
Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 637 (Tex. 1999). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:03 am
United States, 416 U.S. 430, 462-63 (1974) (Marshall, J., dissenting); Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex. 1999). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
Harris Docket: 10-224 Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act’s express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Paul V. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Harris. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
The irony in relying on Jones v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
Jones, 281 Md. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:15 am
See also my Senate testimony on fiduciary duties of investment bankers; my article, Federal Misgovernance of Mutual Funds discussing the debacle culiminating in the Supreme Court’s Jones v. [read post]
