Search for: "Harris v. Department of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
The Sun’s refusal to correct a front page story with a front page correction was, once again, upheld by IPSO. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
For example, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
(I got mine at WaPo.)I feel that the emotional high point came when Kamala Harris was yelling at Joe Biden. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
Sekumade: That's correct, Your Honor. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 6:34 pm
LEXIS 10079 (MD PA, Jan. 18, 2019), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's claim that he was denied a religious exemption from the Department of Corrections's haircut policy. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Three cases – Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:31 am
Harris, 219 N.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:00 am
SB 1300 also expressly affirms or denies specified judicial decisions: Harris v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Tingy (1800), Little v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., 17-1705 Issues: (1) Whether the Hobbs Act strips courts of jurisdiction to engage in a traditional Chevron analysis and requires [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In this regard, it bears noting that some of the Supreme Court’s most celebrated (and legally correct) decisions (such as Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm
Moreover, the article acknowledges that in Clinton v. [read post]
