Search for: "Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs"
Results 81 - 94
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 2:07 pm
The Honolulu Advertiser writes that "OHA looks for some backup," and has drafted a bill, to be considered by the Hawaii Legislature in its upcoming session, that appears to codify the Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:17 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 129 S. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:56 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs - Whether a 1993 congressional resolution requires Hawaii to reach a political settlement with native Hawaiians before transferring some 1.2 million acres of state land. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, et al. (07-1372), and Friday in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OT 2008) US v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OT 2008) US v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 1:03 am
" In their private capacities, Van Dyke and MacKenzie are part of the team of lawyers representing the Office of Hawaiian Affairs in the State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (07-1372) — authority of a state to sell state lands Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 07-1372). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (2009) 67 questions for the OHA and the federal government amicus; 29 questions for the state United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
And while land lines can only tell the phone company (and therefore the government) very limited information about your whereabouts, such as when you were at your home or office, a cell phone travels with you everywhere you go, revealing much more detailed information about your private affairs. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (07-1372). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, et al. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether two federal law enforcement officers are entitled to qualified immunity against First and Fourth Amendment claims stemming from the detention and investigation of anti-abortion protestors. [read post]
