Search for: "Hawkins v. State Bar"
Results 81 - 100
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
Roddenbery, Chair of the Family Law Section, State Bar of Georgia, of the law firm of Holland Schaeffer Roddenbery Blitch LLP, Atlanta, will present the Opening Remarks. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
[pdf] View E-Briefs in THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:06 am
The 9th (Berzon joined by Hawkins and Clifton) concludes that Kelly v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
In Hawkins v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Chairman Liebman concurred in the denial of the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in footnotes 5 and 8 of the Board's Order denying the special appeals. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Coyle Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0406p.06 Hawkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
State of New York Div. of Hous. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
The 9th (Hall joined by Pregerson and Hawkins) affirm. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:12 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 6:01 am
Flash forward to now, and his arguments that the restitution can be barred by the state statute of limitations (1997). [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Rev. 481, 481 (2005), stating that the issue has been labeled an "Armageddon" by some and a "salvation" by others. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Hawkins, No. 06-4061 "Conviction and sentence for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(b), are affirmed over claims that: 1) section 2423(b) is an unconstitutional exercise of the Commerce Power; and 2) the district court erred in relying upon defendant's plea agreement with the government to deny his motions attacking the constitutionality of section 2423(b) on First Amendment… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:28 am
Hawkins
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
