Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 81 - 100 of 5,711
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
AI and Artists’ IP: Unpacking Copyright Infringement Allegations in Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
All rights reserved,” denoting the exclusive rights of the copyright holders, the Andy Warhol Foundation, to the image, and Campbell Soup Co. [read post]
Center for Art Law Blog - http://itsartlaw.com
Weekend Roundup
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Can the Charter Protect Canadians Against Climate Change?
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by West Coast Environmental Law
La Rose v. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca/
Pour Me Another: The Supreme Court Revisits the ‘Bad Wine’ of the Copyright Discovery Rule
22 Feb 2024, 11:29 am by Dennis Crouch
”); and Rotkiske v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Beyond the Limit: The Battle Over Copyright Back-Damages in Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am by Dennis Crouch
See Sohm v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am by Michael C. Dorf
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Claims for workers' compensation benefits based on COVIS-19 must be supported by substantial evidence of a nexus to the claimant's employment
16 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ctr., 222 AD3d 1160; Matter of Aungst v Family Dollar, 221 AD3d 1222; and Matter of Holder v Office for People with Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Claims for workers' compensation benefits based on COVIS-19 must be supported by substantial evidence of a nexus to the claimant's employment
16 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ctr., 222 AD3d 1160; Matter of Aungst v Family Dollar, 221 AD3d 1222; and Matter of Holder v Office for People with Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part IV: Justice Sotomayor and Kagan get the line between national power and federalism
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
But he didn't. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm by Marissa Zupancic | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 Therefore, even if Chief Justice Chase had held in Griffin’s Case, as Trump asserts, that “congressional enforcement legislation [is] the exclusive means for enforcing section 3” (Chase didn’t do so), and even if that proposition were correct (it’s not) or if Chase were right about what he did hold about the inability of courts to enforce Section 3 against someone already in office (he wasn’t), that still would not… [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Couple seeks review of revoked visa
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
Moss v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
WIPIP session 6: IP Theory
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Graham v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
The Fundamentals of Easement Valuation
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
” White v. [read post]
Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski Journal - https://ackerman-ackerman.com/journal/
Top Estate Planning Law Changes for 2024
31 Jan 2024, 2:53 pm by Law Offices of Daniel A. Hunt
Diaz v. [read post]
Law Offices of Daniel A. Hunt Blog - https://www.dhtrustlaw.com/blog/
Execution (of a Person) is a Misleading Term
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
He was one of three petitioners in Glossip v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Game On! Bright Data Scores Major Victory in Web-Scraping Dispute with Meta (Guest Blog Post)
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
He presided over the famous hiQ Labs v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Judge Rules That "Repaying Matured Debt Is Not A Breach" - So Why Is This Case Interesting?
25 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
  Toptal, LLC v. [read post]
California Corporate & Securities Law - https://www.calcorporatelaw.com/