Search for: "Head v. Crouch" Results 81 - 100 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
Dennis Crouch, of the ancient and venerable Patently-O blog, writes about a bit of international procedural wrangling that threatens to open a very big leak in the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
— Dennis Crouch Guest post by Nina Mendelson, Following one Supreme Court decision posing dangers for the integrity of all sorts of agency adjudication, the ongoing litigation in Arthrex v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 10:55 am by John Floyd
He had the gun placed to his own head. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Baxter Healthcare Corp (Gray on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Qui tam plaintiff cites Professor Crouch’s question to readers as proof that patent expiration dates are not readily ascertainable: North Texas Patent Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
  The policy of the current administration and head of the Antitrust Division is in some senses a re-balancing of the risk of hold up versus hold out. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
 On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard)   Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
 Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]