Search for: "Head v. Merit Systems Protection Board"
Results 81 - 100
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Surveillance is both the repository of governance norms and the discipline of those norms within any regulatory system. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Monroe County Board of Education. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
The Supreme Court previously reversed the 11th Circuits habeas relief and declined to address the merits of his claim outside of the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act (AEDPA) context. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Trump signs whistleblower protection bill into law On July 9, the White House announced that President Trump had signed the “All Circuit Review Act,” which provides permanent authority for judicial review of certain Merit Systems Protection Board decisions related to whistleblowers. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
The argument is without merit. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Burwell, a challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s health-care-subsidy system. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm
Arthur served during the 1883 enactment of the Pendleton Act, the first statute to establish a comprehensive merit-based civil service selection system. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm
As Breyer points out, the SEC’s ALJs enjoy a similar multi-level, for-cause protection: An ALJ can be removed only for cause by the Merit Systems Protection Board, whose members in turn can be removed by the president only for cause. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:12 pm
We have grouped states’ concerns under headings but otherwise have kept the interventions on each sub-topic in the order in which they were made. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
The opponents (Os), in particular 04 in its letter of 29.12.2017，argued against a separate appealable decision on legal entitlement to priority since this would delay even further a decision on the merits of the case and by consequence decisions in the co-pending patents and would extend the legal uncertainty for the public. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Setting aside the reality that Egan posed the rather narrow question whether a naval employee denied a security clearance had a statutory right to review of the decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Court’s central rationale for ruling against a right of review was the importance in the security context of respecting expert agency discretion. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Setting aside the reality that Egan posed the rather narrow question whether a naval employee denied a security clearance had a statutory right to review of the decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Court’s central rationale for ruling against a right of review was the importance in the security context of respecting expert agency discretion. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s: SEC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm
But off the top of my head, I don't know what those records would be. [read post]
