Search for: "Health & Welfare v. Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Golias v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:03 pm
ShareCivil rights plaintiffs scored a significant victory in Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
” With regard to the goals of the law, and whether the law achieves its goals, the parties had very different views: Prior to the vote on Proposition 12, proponents suggested the law would benefit animal welfare and consumer health, and opponents claimed that existing farming practices did better than Proposition 12 protecting animal welfare (for example, by preventing pig-on-pig aggression) and ensuring consumer health (by avoiding contamination). [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
” With regard to the goals of the law, and whether the law achieves its goals, the parties had very different views: Prior to the vote on Proposition 12, proponents suggested the law would benefit animal welfare and consumer health, and opponents claimed that existing farming practices did better than Proposition 12 protecting animal welfare (for example, by preventing pig-on-pig aggression) and ensuring consumer health (by avoiding contamination). [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:01 am
From H.B. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
DorfMy Verdict column on Friday praised Justice Gorsuch for the sensitivity towards animal welfare that he demonstrated in his lead opinion in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:37 am
, Marcavage v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 7:45 am
Monterey County, like all municipalities across California, has extensive authority under its general police power to adopt regulations related to public health, safety, and welfare. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am
Discriminatory impact can occur even when the advertiser does not intend to discriminate. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
If a consensus does exist, among whom must the consensus exist (for example practicing physicians, or professional organizations, or medical researchers, or public health officials, or perhaps a combination)? [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm
This approach does not result in any breach of statutory duty. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:13 pm
(Johnson v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The matter must either relate to serious misconduct, or it must otherwise be important for safeguarding the public welfare in matters of health and safety (or of comparable public importance) that the information should be known to whom it is disclosed. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] N.J. Appellate Court Affirms Family Court Judge's Refusal to Order COVID Vaccination
29 Apr 2023, 10:59 am
From Scott v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
So what does the Court of Appeal say about this? [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
” Bullard v. [read post]
