Search for: "Heard v. Hart"
Results 81 - 100
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
On Wednesday 21 March 2012, the Supreme Court gave its long awaited judgment in the Reynolds qualified privilege case of Flood v Times Newspapers, (heard 17 and 18 October 2011). [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
On 26 May 2022, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
Judgment was rserved On 3 May 2013, Tugendhat J heard the application on the return date in the case of ABK v KDT & anr. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were 10 new… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
That might be so at the interlocutory stage in an attempt to avoid the rule in Bonnard v Perryman: a matter, it will be recalled that exercised this court in Woodward v Hutchins. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 pm
He was co-counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Text of the complaint and the proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:50 pm
Hart’s Food Stores, Inc., 267 F.2d 358 (2d Cir. 1959). [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
Both parties agreed noot to await the Court of Appeal decision in Rakusen v Jepson (due to be heard in July 2021). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
On 13 December 2022, Saini J heard argument in the case of Smith v Talk Talk Telecom (QB-2020-003019). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
We had a post about the decision from David Hart QC. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The application was made in bad faith and was an “instrument of fraud”, relying on BT v One in a Million [1999] 1 WLR 903, which established that domain names registered by squatters were instruments of fraud and their registration could amount to passing off even without any active use of them.District Judge Hart (on the IPEC Small Claims track) gave a first instance judgment on 25 March 2020 agreeing with the claimant, but granted permission to appeal.An appeal was… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
June 20, 2011 David Hart QC Filed under: In the news Tagged: human rights, roundup [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
IP and Other Things: A Collection of Essays and Speeches by Robin Jacob is published by Hart Publishing (Bloomsbury). [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
On 23 May 2018 there was an assessment of damages in the IPEC before District Judge Hart in the case of Robert Grahn T/A Euroluftbilde.De v Express Newspapers On 24 May 2018, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers [2018] EWHC 1234 (QB). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
"That jurisdiction includes all cases of every description in law and equity, from the most important and complicated to the most simple and insignificant" (Nestor v McDowell, 81 NY2d 410, 415 [1993], quoting Maresca v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 242 [1984]; De Hart v Hatch, 3 Hun 375, 380), and includes any new classes of actions or proceedings that the Legislature may create (see NY Const, art VI, § 7 [b]; Kagen v 193 Misc.2d 435] Kagen, 21… [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Expanding the size of the Court could accomplish similar results and, at the same time, enable the Court to increase the number of disputes to be heard on its record-small docket. [read post]
