Search for: "Heath v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 5:19 am
Recently the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in its judgement of CDE Asia Limited v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
(Separately, a parallel private action, Ploss v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Heath Coffman & Kevin C. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:51 am
Dunjun v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:53 am
Miquel MontañáIn Odiorne v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:39 am
” The Federal Circuit construed the language consistently with the protocol described in the specification (SIPCO, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 8:56 am
The decision directs us to Lewison J’s comment in Ivax Pharmaceuticals v Akzo Nobel NV [2006] which states that “obstacles to regulatory approval….are not relevant obstacles to an obviousness attack”. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 2:15 am
Case date: 05 December 2019 Case number: No. 18-1363 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
DOL Proposes New Electronic Distribution Rule Errors in ACA Penalty Assessments Require Prompt Employer Action New Health Care Design Opportunity for Large Employers: Individual HRAs Newly Proposed Health Insurance Cost and Coverage Transparency Requirements Remedial Amendment Period Closing Soon for Self-Correcting 403(b) Plans IRS Opens Determination Letter Window to Cash Balance and Other Hybrid Plans Final Regulations on 401(k) Hardship Withdrawals Massachusetts Among Several States… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
” Judge Dyk would hear the decisions on the merits, rather than vacate them for a new hearing before a new panel below (BedGear, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am
Are the UPCA and the ratification laws compatible with the State’s duty to protect constitutional identity? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:43 am
For instance, in Imar v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Case date: 20 September 2019 Case number: No. 18-2388 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:56 am
” The recent judgment of 12 September 2019 (case C-688/12, Bayer Pharma AG v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:06 am
Filing and examination fee discounts extended to joint applicants A 30% reduction for the filing and examination fees is available for entitled applicants such as SMEs, natural persons and universities from an EPC contracting state having an official language different from one of the official languages of the EPO. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:55 am
Auth. (7th Cir. 2002) and Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:50 am
Finally, the Board did not abuse its discretion by declining to consider an untimely argument made by the petitioner (Henny Penny Corporation v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
So, this planning under conditions of certainty is not helpful to us as heath care professionals. [read post]
