Search for: "Held v. Davis"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2007, 6:40 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:18 pm
by Lee DavisIn State of Tennessee v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
Davis, the Court held that the Fifth Circuit had applied the wrong standard to review a district court decision to deny a funding request in a capital habeas case under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:10 am
That’s the message the Third Circuit sent a few days before Labor Day, when it issued Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 11:15 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:59 am
Termination for disrespectful conduct dual constitutes disqualifying misconduct for the purposes of claiming unemployment insurance benefitsMatter of Davis v Commissioner of Labor, 2009 NY Slip Op 05922, decided on July 23, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentDeborah Davis worked as a school district secretary for approximately 2 ½ years. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
While Vargas was moving through one court, Davis v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:39 pm
There are many homeowner associations that look like any other and collect fees and assessments, but in fact are not subject to the Davis-Stirling Act based on the holdings in Mount Olympus Property Owners Ass'n v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Despite substantial new evidence of his innocence, no court has ever held a hearing to assess the scores of new witnesses that show Mr. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:54 am
CEATS v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:34 pm
In February, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court decision in Davis, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
Here is the complaint in Rash v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:19 am
In Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
A sole shareholder of a closely held corporation hires an attorney. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Such is the case in Allen v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:05 am
A union’s qui tam action against a roofing contractor failed because there was no evidence the contractor’s Davis-Bacon violation was “knowing,” held the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:34 am
Davis held, contrary to Barrett, that the residual clause of 924(c)(3)(B) is void for vagueness. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:11 pm
Citing Fico, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:05 am
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) Davis v. [read post]
