Search for: "Henkell v. Henkell"
Results 81 - 99
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
On reading this, the Dutch Supreme Court acknowledged that the Den Bosch Court of Appeal had applied the correct test for assessing the distinctive character of a shape (Joined Cases C-456/01 P and C-457/01P Henkel KGaA v OHIM; Case C-25/05 August Storck KG v OHIM and Joined Cases C-53/01, C-54/01 and C-55/01, Linde AG). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 76 (1906). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:38 am
And Oracle v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Free World Trust v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Free World Trust v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
” Henkel v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:22 pm
Whether the decision in the case C-645/11, Land Berlin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Let the names begin (Intellectual Property Watch) EPO, JPO, USPTO, SIPO and KIPO agree on work sharing initiative (IAM) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPR-Helpdesk) Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants future work to include global policy challenges (Intellectual Property Watch) End of life for IP (Securing Innovation) Royalty monetization: high-profile deals generate excitement among TTOs (Technology Transfer Tactics) Indentifying valuable… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Cir. 2009) (requiring corroboration where patentee tried to prove that the conception date was earlier than the filing date of a potentially anticipatory patent); Henkel Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Innovationpartners), ICANN reforms threaten voice of IP owners: (Managing Intellectual Property), INTA 130th annual meeting – a report: (IPKat), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IAM), INTA’s online Committee Portal premiers: (Managing Intellectual Property), Hans Van Bylen tells how careful brand management and exploitation of ‘glocal’ products helped Henkel become global player: (Managing Intellectual Property), Records number of IP owners applied… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
Id. at 41 (citing Henkel Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
., Hale v. [read post]
