Search for: "Henry v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 2,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
The Bishop of Exeter, Henry Phillpotts, said in the debate in the House of Lords that the bill was “a disgrace to British legislation. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
They fought against the passage of California’s Proposition 12, the country’s strongest farm animal protection law, and then its implementation, all the way to the Supreme Court, which decided against them in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am by SHG
” The majority in Plessy v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:41 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
§ 292.1 authorize attorneys to represent noncitizens in a variety of immigration benefits requests, federal statutes and immigration officers often plant barriers that impede effective legal representation.Consider these examples: The Supreme Court will soon decide United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am by The Regulatory Review Staff
May 9, 2022 | Aborting the Right to Abortion | A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion turns the national debate over Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Putting aside rights that arise from contractual or other state-law guarantees of academic freedom, if a public employee is speaking (even on matters of public concern) while on the job, qua employee, then under the 2006 Supreme Court Garcetti v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:52 am by David Pocklington
George the Martyr Preston [4], in which Hodge Ch. stated: “[29]. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Monday's Fourth Circuit opinions from Judges Robert King, Marvin Quattlebaum, and Henry Floyd (Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]