Search for: "High v. Parker"
Results 81 - 100
of 432
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
The case, Liu v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The Court’s ruling yesterday in McGirt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:57 am
The Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Park) disagrees. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 5:05 pm
City of New London and Berman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
As early as 1983, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) noted that there was a high rate of hospital emergency room misuse by Medicaid recipients who would utilize high-cost emergency rooms for the care and treatment of non-emergency medical issues. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
As early as 1983, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) noted that there was a high rate of hospital emergency room misuse by Medicaid recipients who would utilize high-cost emergency rooms for the care and treatment of non-emergency medical issues. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm
Executive Branch: Friends in High PlacesAs nurses protest and file litigation for lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) to fulfill their essential roles on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic, they call on President Donald. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Lucas and Giorgianni v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:09 am
Al Jazeera: “As Native peoples self-isolate, outsiders are still demanding in” CBS: “Longstanding issues put Native American communities at high COVID-19 risk” Parker Pioneer: “A look at Montana v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
He thus “wholeheartedly” agreed with the Opinion of AG Bobek in C-220/15:In accordance with the prohibition of contra legem interpretation and the principle of the separation of powers, a dynamic or teleological interpretation is only possible where ‘the text of the provision itself [is] open to different interpretations, presenting some degree of textual ambiguity and vagueness’.Albeit that one of the objectives of the Enforcement Directive and, with that, Article 8… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:58 am
Diehr, 450 U.S. 101 at 187; Parker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Provisions Affecting Coverage and Payment Under the Medicare & Medicaid Programs Section 3701, Health Savings Accounts for Telehealth Services: This section allows a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) with a health savings account (HSA) to cover telehealth services prior to a patient reaching the deductible, increasing access for patients who may have the COVID-19 virus and protecting other patients from potential exposure. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:29 am
Perhaps the time has passed that students can be taught the law at its high and low. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:08 am
See Diehr, 450 U.S. at 187; Parker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
Thus, MA Plans will be allowed to vary or target SSBCI to an individual’s particular medical needs.[9] However, the 2020 Final Call Letter also states that while MA Plans have broad discretion with respect to both non-uniformity and the form of the benefit, itself, the items or services provided must have a reasonable expectation of improving or maintaining the health or overall function of an individual as it relates to the chronic condition or illness.[10] For the purpose of… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
On 26 February 2020 there was a pre-trial review before Nicol J in what promises to be one of the most high profile libel trials of the year, Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
