Search for: "Hill v. Daniels" Results 81 - 100 of 474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 10:15 am by Shahram Miri
A mole hill had mushroomed into a mountain as the opinion detailed the numerous hearings that had been held over the years. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
  Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Daniel Solove at ACSblog, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Michael Price at the Brennan Center, David Kravets at Wired, Nina Totenberg of NPR, Jamie Dupree of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Kashmir Hill at Forbes, and Arin Greenwood at the Huffington Post all have previews of the case. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:04 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lydia Wheeler of The Hill provides early coverage of the Court’s second argument this morning, the Fair Labor Standards Act case Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:37 am by Daniel Hart
On a motion for reconsideration, the district court vacated its prior order, holding that, under the Georgia Court of Appeals’ decision in Bunker Hill Int’l, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Julie Burkhart warns that “[t]he confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court will lead to a decision to overturn or gut the essence of Roe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Hill, Juan Williams weighs in on King v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Allison Trzop
Herrmann, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
” At The Hill, Timothy Jost discusses the possible consequences if the Court were to hold in King v. [read post]