Search for: "Holder v Jacob"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2025, 2:42 pm
In Kahn v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Laffey Associates (Property, intangible) 2d Circuit: The long arm of New York copyright holders: Can New York copyright lawyers sue America without leaving Manhattan? [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:57 am
Dawes, (we filed an amicus brief), and United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:05 am
CAR and Ball v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
Jacob) on April 20, 2012 that a trade secret holder has the burden – early in the case – to identify its trade secrets with specificity. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 3:11 pm
In one respect, however, SB 21 goes beyond what Hamermesh, Jacobs, and Strine proposed. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
The guest speaker will be Lord Justice Robert "Robin" Jacob, Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:47 pm
The Supreme Court's 2019 ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
Lord Neuberger echoed this statement regarding the right-holder's choices and the consequences flowing from choices made in the design field:52. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
The Gupta case is U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
This post examines a recent opinion a U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
Another is Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484, 10 N.Y.S.3d 2 [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Devgan v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:06 am
The unanimous ruling in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
In Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council, the principle of legality was held to mean that a body exercising public power is required to act within the powers lawfully given to it, and in President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union, the principle necessitated that the holder of the public power must act in good faith and not misconstrue his powers. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
With respect to the binding force of a jurisdiction agreement in a bill of lading for the third party holder of the bill of lading, stakeholders have suggested that a carrier under a bill of lading should be bound by and at the same token allowed to invoke a jurisdiction clause against the regular third-party holder, unless the bill is not sufficiently clear in determining jurisdiction. [read post]
