Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 12:45 pm
Holder, No. 10-545. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm
Judge Stucky, writing for a unanimous court in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:05 am
“The longstanding, historical position of the United States regarding judicial review of the constitutionality of federal legislation has not changed and was accurately stated by counsel for the government at oral argument in this case a few days ago,” Holder wrote, addressing his letter to the three-judge appellate panel. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:29 am
“Nor can Jiang rely on her claim that because she has had two children in the United States she will face persecution in China for violations of that country’s one-child [...] [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:12 am
United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On 20 December 2020 Congress approved the “second-largest economic relief package in US history” of USD 900bn (the first tracking back to the beginning of the pandemic in March, securing USD 2.2tn). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
Holder, many of the Justices appeared sympathetic to Congress’s power to create a U.S. copyright in a work that had previously been in the private domain within the United States, at least in cases where, for various reasons, the work had never previously had a U.S. copyright. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
On August 31, at the request of Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USTPO) provided a report to Congress analyzing infringement disputes between patent and trademark rights holders and states and state entities. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 7:32 am
” Sassi-Lehner v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:59 pm
United States Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 10:06 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:10 am
In Warshak v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
If your biological parents had stayed unmarried, you'd be free to stay in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:57 am
There are two cases for argument in the United States Supreme Court's October Term that may be of interest to creditors- Ransom v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:21 am
In that case, the court of appeals addressed the question whether a removable alien who has left and reentered the United States may obtain nunc... [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 am
Holder, which presents the following questions: (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public... [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:49 pm
Holder United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit No 10-70087 (January 4, 2011) Facts: Mr. [read post]
